Anton Bruckner,
Symphony No. 7
Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, conducted By Karl Böhm
June 1943, Guttman edition (Preiser CD 90102)
September 1976, Nowak edition (Deutsche Grammophon CD 419
858)
May 1977, Nowak edition (Audite CD 95.494)
Although not terribly celebrated as a Bruckner conductor,
Karl Böhm left a relatively substantial recorded legacy, with 24
surviving recordings of the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th,
and 8th symphonies. Böhm’s lyrical and expansive approach to
Bruckner is probably best suited to the 7th symphony, which was
certainly the symphony of which we have the best recorded legacy. There are 2
surviving performances of the Guttman edition, including the 1943 performance
reviewed here, and 9 of the Nowak edition, including the 1976 studio recording
for Deutsche Grammoph and the 1977 live performance preserved in excellent
sound by Audite.
It is interesting to compare the evolution of Böhm’s
interpretation from the war years to the two performances when he was already over
80. The timings are very informative. The 1943 Adagio stretches for a very
lengthy 27.36, while the DG and Audite discs come in at 24.04 and 22.15
respectively. At the same time, the finale is significantly shorter in 1943
(10.37, as opposed to 12.03 and 12.04). It is characteristic of Böhm’s 7th
symphony interpretations that the Adagio is typically longer than the scherzo
and finale combined, but the contrast in 1943 is remarkable. I am not convinced
that this extreme architecture works. There are several moments when the Adagio
seems about to grind to a halt, and the relatively aggressive approach to the
finale distorts the pacing required for the movement not to seem lightweight
after the monumental Adagio and what amounts to a second slow movement in the
Trio of the 3rd movement. The sound from the 1943 recording is
perfectly acceptable, but it would be difficult to recommend the performance for
more than historical interest.
Böhm’s interpretation is much more secure in the 1970’s
recordings. The balance between the movements works much better architecturally
and the sound quality allows the finer points of Böhm’s approach to come
across, in both the live and studio performances. Böhm is a master at shaping
Bruckner’s melodic line – as can be appreciated from the opening bars of the
Adagio in both performances. He is also highly skilled at bringing out the complex
texture of Bruckner’s orchestration. The coda to the first movement illustrates
this nicely both live and in the studio.
The 1976 studio performance is marked by very sensuous
string playing and great delicacy from the wind sections. The Adagio is
well-paced, and the coda displays the VPO beautifully. However, the climax
falls a little flat (due not least to a rather subdued percussion section) and
the movement lacks the emotional engagement of the live performance, which I
found more convincing overall. The Audite sound is good enough to bring out Böhm’s
distinctive lyricism. At the same time, the live performance has a sharper edge
and greater drive, with a more compelling vision of the architecture of the 7th. The Audite disc is highly recommended.
A wonderful review.
ReplyDeleteNice to meet your sensitive blog.
If given a choice, which would you choose? The DG or the Audite?
ReplyDeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading my blog. That's an interesting question. Personally I would take the Audite live performance over the DG studio recording. Tbe sound is excellent and I think that the performance is more unified and compelling. Let me know what you think!
Regards,
José