Friday, October 19, 2012

Wand and Tennstedt Bruckner DVDs from ICA


Bruckner, Symphony No. 5
BBC Symphony Orchestra, conduced by Günter Wand
ICA Classics DVD ICAD 5049

Bruckner, Symphony No. 7
Boston Symphony Orchestra, conduced by Klaus Tennstedt
ICA Classics DVD ICAD 5066


ICA Classics is the in-house label of the International Classical Artists artist management agency. It puts out historical recordings in its Legacy series, as well as live recordings of its own artists in its Live series. The Legacy series has four Bruckner DVD recordings – in addition to the two reviewed here, the catalog features Bruckner’s 8th, played by the Boston Symphony under William Steinberg and the 7th, played by Charles Munch, also with the Boston Symphony. (Click here for my review of the Steinberg recording.) The Wand 5th was recorded live at the Proms in September 1990, when Wand was a sprightly 78, while the Tennstedt 7th was captured in November 1977, relatively early in Tennstedt’s career outside East Germany (he had defected only in 1971).

The Günter Wand DVD has a bonus interview with the conductor – Michael Berkeley is the interviewer (although in 2’54” there is not much time for him to shape the conversation!). Wand says some very insightful things about Bruckner, and it is definitely worth watching the interview before listening to the performance. One thing Wand emphasizes is the importance of steady tempi in Bruckner – as he puts it, “rubato can make the whole edifice collapse”. 

 The 5th Symphony, Bruckner’s most austere work, is very well suited to Wand’s architectural approach, particularly in the last movement where pride of place is taken by a fugue and then a magnificent double fugue.  Wand delivers a very compelling performance. His conducting is light on gesture and emphasis, but communicates a clear vision of the 5th symphony’s complex structure. The final coda rightfully brought the house down.

Tennstedt has a very different conducting style to Wand. He is much more prone to rubato and variable tempi. Some passages sound as slow as I can remember hearing them. The comparison between Wand and Tennstedt is very much between Wand’s structural conception and Tennstedt’s emphasis on shaping the individual phrase – wood vs. trees, one might put it, a little unkindly. Of the four movements, the Adagio emerged most clearly in Tennstedt’s hands. The structure was brought out, while there was wonderful attention to sonic detail. The coda was played almost like a piece of chamber music. Overall, however, the performance does not convince.

The sound in the Wand recording is good, while the Tennstedt recording leaves something to be desired (with the strings sounding a little subdued, although the brass emerges clearly). Brucknerians will certainly want to add the Wand to their ever-expanding Wand discography. The Tennstedt is for enthusiasts only, however.

No comments:

Post a Comment